It would not be acceptable for me to take a dig at Joyner or anybody, earlier than assessing the scenario. Yesterday afternoon was the second Joyner Lucas spoke his piece in regards to the regrettable encounters he is had with “shoddy” journalists since effervescent up. The following Tweets are fairly simple; he would not throw anybody underneath the bus, aside from Peter Rosenberg who was reportedly fiddling on his cellphone throughout an in-studio interview with Lucas this previous 12 months.
In some respects, it is virtually as if he is simply utilizing the Twitter platform as an open-call to journalists to raised their practices, with out ruling out flip aspect the argument. Other than Rosenberg, we do not know who the culprits are and it would not appear to matter.
Those who did Lucas soiled will really feel it in their intestine. The posts aren’t essentially aimed toward most people, despite the fact that the repercussions a “media boycott” will definitely be felt by these deep-lying followers. This conundrum may be very symptomatic a rapper trapped inside a polarizing debate with no answer in sight.
If you battle Tory Lanez, win or lose, you are up towards his legion followers, not simply his lyrical prowess. If the media manages to make a spectacle out the scenario, nicely..we’re again on the hen and egg paradox are we not? But in Lucas’ protection, he’s in all probability strolling away from the media, so he can let the mud settle, and resume his musical profession free the tabloids. I am with Joyner on this one for what it is price, the “for-prit” system can actually summon the ugly out a wise individual, all peoples.